You're right. As I say ... wikipedia is good with non-contentious stuff (or stuff nobody cares about).
My contention is with "THE" anthropic principle. I'm no authority - just a collector of interesting alternate views - joining dots. Ian On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 7:02 PM, <craig...@comcast.net> wrote: > Hi Ian, > I thought Wikipedia did a good job in distinguishing "anthropocentrism" from > the "anthropic principle". > So far these entries haven't been altered and remain a good starting point. > Carter is mentioned so it could eventually lead back to Psybertron. > Craig > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
