Hello everyone On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:57 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > Though the interviewer I found a little stuffy at times - it's a good Doco.
Hi David Yes I found that to be true as well. But I think we need to look beyond that at the artist being portrayed, don't you? David H: I think the role of rta within the MOQ is at the crux of the interplay between DQ and sq. We can talk about a 'balance' of DQ and sq all we want but really that's all just sq. The real signpost to DQ is mastering sq. You and I have talked about this before, but after we have got something 'mastered' then the static quality disappears and there's nothing left but DQ. That's how you experience Dynamic Quality.. > > It's all in the practice of sq and the care of sq and the suffering > which-comes-from-breaking-up of sq. If you do something over and over again > with the aim of doing it good, you end up forgetting about it and it's gone... Dan: Well, possibly... but I'm not sure you're taking this part into account: “It’s very important to remember,” Evans says, “that no matter how far I might diverge or find freedom in this format, it only is free insofar as it has reference to the strictness of the original form. And that’s what gives it its strength. In other words, there is no freedom except in reference to something.” He is adamant that there is always a reference base pertaining strictly to the original form. That part is never gone... if it were, the work of art isn't good... in fact it would devolve into nonsense. At least that's how I read this. Thank you, Dan http://www.danglover.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
