[Tuukka]
this is actually pretty interesting. We have contradictory ideas of what it 
means for the MOQ to manifest. I could say you find this manifestation to take 
place in the meta axis.

[Arlo]
We don't have contrary ideas of what it 'means for the MOQ to manifest', 
Tuukka, the MOQ does not manifest, it IS a manifestation. It is Quality that 
'manifests' as static patterns, not 'the MOQ'. The MOQ is an intellectual 
manifestation (pattern) **OF** Quality. 

A metatheory that proposes 'DQ/sq/MOQ' is an SOM attempt at resolving 
'recursion' by holding that you can 'back out of the container'. You can't. 
Metatheories, like theories, are intellectual patterns. They may be more 
complex, in the way that a human body is more complex than an amoeba, but they 
are not a new level, and certainly NOT a new metaphysical 'primacy'. 

You continue to confuse "the metaphysics OF Quality" with "Quality", the menu 
for the 'food'. A rock is NOT a manifestation of "the MOQ", it is an inorganic 
pattern OF Quality, a manifestation of Quality. The MOQ is an intellectual 
pattern that tries to describe this process. That a book, or an idea, or a 
theory, can 'manifest' itself as a rock is not something I would consider to be 
useful as a theory in any way.

I'm not sure what more I can say on this, Tuukka. 


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to