Hi David,
I understand Dynamic Quality to be indivisible, undefinable and unknowable -
undifferentiated - unpatterned. Not pure perceptions. I am not sure what you
mean by "difference/DQ/uniqueness," so I don't know if I agree or disagree.
Marsha
p.s. I am really enjoying 'The Master and His Emissary'.
On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:00 PM, "David Morey" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Let's eat a banana, and then eat another one, and experience its full flavour.
>
> I assume that as they are both bananas they have much in common, that this
> is the sort of pattern we can experience that we wish to call SQ.
>
> Of course, no two bananas are exactly the same, although they have a certain
> level of similarity/SQ.
>
> Each banana was grown in a different place, in a different soil, under a sun
> on different days, etc. So each banana is a bit different and we may well
> experience this difference in their taste and so they experience two different
> varieties of the full range of possible flavours for individual bananas. And
> this is a significant part of what we mean by difference/DQ/uniqueness.
>
> Do we all agree with the above dear MOQers or not?
>
> All the best
> David M
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
