From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] D i a l e c t i c


[21a] He was my comrade from a youth and the comrade of your democratic party, 
and shared in the recent exile and came back with you. And you know the kind of 
man Chaerephon was, how impetuous in whatever he undertook. Well, once he went 
to Delphi and made so bold as to ask the oracle this question; and, gentlemen, 
don't make a disturbance at what I say; for he asked if there were anyone wiser 
than I. Now the Pythia replied that there was no one wiser. And about these 
things his brother here will bear you witness, since Chaerephon is dead. [21b] 
But see why I say these things; for I am going to tell you whence the prejudice 
against me has arisen. For when I heard this, I thought to myself: “What in the 
world does the god mean, and what riddle is he propounding? For I am conscious 
that I am not wise either much or little. What then does he mean by declaring 
that I am the wisest? He certainly cannot be lying, for that is not possible 
for him.” And for
a long time I was at a loss as to what he meant; then with great reluctance I 
proceeded to investigate him somewhat as follows.

I went to one of those who had a reputation for wisdom, [21c] thinking that 
there, if anywhere, I should prove the utterance wrong and should show the 
oracle “This man is wiser than I, but you said I was wisest.” So examining this 
man—for I need not call him by name, but it was one of the public men with 
regard to whom I had this kind of experience, men of Athens—and conversing with 
him, this man seemed to me to seem to be wise to many other people and 
especially to himself, but not to be so; and then I tried to show him that he 
thought [21d] he was wise, but was not. As a result, I became hateful to him 
and to many of those present; and so, as I went away, I thought to myself, “I 
am wiser than this man; for neither of us really knows anything fine and good, 
but this man thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas I, as I do not 
know anything, do not think I do either. I seem, then, in just this little 
thing to be wiser than this man at
any rate, that what I do not know I do not think I know either.” From him I 
went to another of those who were reputed [21e] to be wiser than he, and these 
same things seemed to me to be true; and there I became hateful both to him and 
to many others. ...  

---

Oh yes, not a mere footnote, but a great story.  'Once upon a Plato' will never 
be the same. Plato was after absolute truth.  Can we move on now?  Really!  
That was then and this is now.  Can we move on now to what the great mother 
knows that everything is connected to everything.  Entanglement. 

[Ron adds:]
If Plato was after "absolute truth" and contended that the absolute truth IS 
"no one knows" and he hated those who thought they knew
something....
 
 
So WHY are you diss'n on Plato? 
 
sounds like he should be your hero..
 
I mean look at it, His hatefulness (his downfall) is derived from being told he 
was the wisest.
And what made him wisest was that he understood that he really did'nt know 
anything.
 
BUT he was saying he knew something , he knows when someone thinks they are 
wise. By being hateful towards it.
 
So Plato really did'nt believe he knew nothing he just said that to appear wise 
or to atleast say what a wise person should.
You have to then ask if he was then serving some selfish desire to correct 
everyone by proving he was indeed wisest by
demonstrating that no one knows anything. Hatefully, therefore there was an 
extreme sense of self -rightousness.
 
Which made him an asshole.
 
 
....
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to