So whenevef you hit something hard with your toe, like a physical pattern, it's 
just hypothetical. Yes or No?

Truth might be painful.

All the best

JanAndrs


20 maj 2013 kl. 15:31 MarshaV wrote <[email protected]>:

> 
> 
> If again you are addressing static (relative) truths, than yes indeed, it is 
> better by far.  But personally, I prefer to stick with RMP's terminology 
> "static patterns of value" without the need to assign the term 'truth'.  And 
> I prefer to think of all static patterns of value as hypothetical.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On May 20, 2013, at 9:07 AM, David Harding wrote:
> 
>> To those folks it does. However I think that the MOQ's theory of truth is 
>> better. Don't you?
>> 
>> On 20/05/2013, at 10:32 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi David,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We're talking static (relative) truths, right?  
>>> 
>>> 'High quality intellectual patterns'?  Sounds good, but considering that by 
>>> consensus (in the noted survey of intellectuals for example) correspondence 
>>> theories seem to win, who's to make such a 'general' determination?  
>>> Obviously, those who answered the survey question thought they were 
>>> choosing the highest quality theory.   Does that qualify as truth?  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 20, 2013, at 7:45 AM, David Harding wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Marsha,
>>>> 
>>>> All theories of truth are intellectual. With truth being high quality 
>>>> intellectual patterns - they are true depending on how good they are. I 
>>>> think the best 'theory of truth' is the one offered by the MOQ - 'High 
>>>> quality intellectual patterns'. 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Would some theories of truth be excluded from the intellectual static 
>>>>> pattern of value labeled 'truth'?  
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marsha
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 19, 2013, at 5:06 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Most believed theories
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> According to a survey of professional philosophers and others on their 
>>>>>> philosophical views which was carried out in November 2009 (taken by 
>>>>>> 3226 respondents, including 1803 philosophy faculty members and/or PhDs 
>>>>>> and 829 philosophy graduate students) 44.9% of respondents accept or 
>>>>>> lean towards correspondence theories, 20.7% accept or lean towards 
>>>>>> deflationary theories and 13.8% epistemic theories.[42]. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to