Sorry David, I hijacked your Sellars link ..... carry on ;-) Ian
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I'm saying quite simply ... they relate "in the movement / > flow / dynamic in which they both participate". > > To use the McGilchrist metaphor - the missing ingredient is the corpus > callosum - the permissive gate that ensures right and left hemispheres > can operate in quite different ways but still communicate. And, > continuing with the divided brain metaphor - the age old problem is > that because each half uses a different language about different > aspects of the world, the one often doesn't appreciate the value of > the other. So for real balanced brain function you need all three - > the two perspectives AND the movement / flow / dynamic in which they > both participate. > > It's really not complicated, is it ? > Ian > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:42 AM, David Morey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi Ian >> >> I agree, I think both perspectives have their value and we need to >> understand how and why to move between them and how they relate. >> >> All the best >> David >> >> Ian Glendinning <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>Hi David, >>> >>>I tend to think of that third perspective as the Yin and Yang - a >>>balance of the two - a respect between the other two - a co-creation >>>of the other two - an "inclusional flow" of the other two - choose >>>your metaphor - .... Rather than something distinct (that really would >>>be a magic bullet if you can find it). >>> >>>I think of this as Rebecca's "Relationalism" (of the two) as an >>>antidote to any kind of relativism (between them). >>> >>>And - PAUL - PLEASE come back and talk to us. >>>Ian >>> >>>On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:16 PM, David Morey <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>>> Hi MOQers >>>> >>>> This video on Sellars and the Myth of the Given featuring Ray Brassier >>>> is certainly of interest to MOQers: >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI5MZ2kBK9M >>>> >>>> All the best >>>> David M >>>> >>>> PS Thanks to Paul Turner for his good essay on 2 perspectives on the MOQ, >>>> do we need a third perspective that takes the best of the lower 2? >>>> >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>> Archives: >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>>Moq_Discuss mailing list >>>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>>http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>>Archives: >>>http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>>http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
