Horse,
There isn't enough time in the word to respond to every point you made
earlier in THIS thread and as you pointed out I wasn't responding
directly to any question put to me anyway.

All I will says is, to your points about sloppiness and gibberish vs
clarity and precision:

Yes it's a philosophy discussion group - but it is not a discussion
group necessarily confined by the standards of existing philosophical
academe. The different perspectives within MoQ demand different
standards of discourse. The objective, scientistic, syllogistic
standards of context 2 are not privileged to dominate context 1 - what
those are in context 1 is harder to say (by definition), but respect
and democracy are aspects of it.

If you want more than arm-waving, ask a direct and specific question.
Ian
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to