That was hillarious. Made my week Marsha.
Ian.
On 8 Aug 2013 18:39, "MarshaV" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Aug 8, 2013, at 12:54 PM, david buchanan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Marsha said:
> >
> > Does that second premise hold?
> >
> > 1. Marsha posts the quote "Kill all intellectual patterns."
> > 2. "Kill all intellectual patterns." is an anti-intellectual statement.
> > 3. Therefore, Marsha is an anti-intellectual.
> >
>
> > The basic structure of an argument is
> >
> >                        A = B
> >                        B = C
> >   Therefore,   A = C
> >
> > Where the premises can be checked, and it can be seen that the
> conclusion, indeed, follows from the premises.
> >
> > You bet, dmb, I have no interest in addressing your general and nebulous
> complaints and criticisms.
> >
>
> dmb,
>
> Oh my, the argument was a bit of a parody, didn't you recognize it?
>
> >
> >
> > dmb says:
> >
> > The second premise is false (and the first premise isn't really a
> premise).
> >
> > If you're trying to formulate something like my argument, the first and
> second premise should be combined.
> >
> > 1. Marsha mistakenly posts the quote, "kill all intellectual patterns,"
> AS IF it were an anti-intellectual statement.
>
> Yes, that's right.  It is an unwarranted premise.
>
>
> > 2. The quote, taken in context, is not an anti-intellectual statement
> but rather a statement about the perfection and mastery of intellectual
> static quality for the purpose of raising rationality to art form.
>
> I didn't really take the second premise to be true.  That was why I raised
> the question in the second post.  I see the statement to "Kill all
> Intellectual patterns" is a reference to mediation/mindfulness, a statement
> I've made many times, where the conceptual (language) portion of mind is
> dropped.
>
>
> > 3. Marsha has misunderstood the quote and thereby come to a bogus,
> anti-intellect conclusion.
>
> No, just like you so often do, I replaced logic with parody.  It was like
> your little OZ parody, but nearly as creative or mean-spirited.
>
>
>
> > But of course syllogistic logic is a very ancient and very simple form.
> It's an indifferent, trivial little machine that does no real work. Garbage
> in, garbage out.
>
> And garbage in, garbage out is what I find your "specific criticisms" to
> be, unwarranted accusations.   And why I wrote to Ant that "I can accept
> that dmb has different value judgements than mine as a result of our
> different histories and current patterns of values."  And why yesterday I
> wrote to you "I'm not buying your rhetoric. ... I am not here to accept
> your interpretations, opinions and judgements [concerning the MoQ] as Holy
> Writ.  I'll leave you to be as you are, and be with you own thoughts."  And
> why I say to you now:  Your thoughts are your own: they're not me, they are
> not mine.
>
>
>
> > And I'd bet big bucks that logic has nothing to do with it because, for
> you, anti-intellectualism is always your premise AND your conclusion.
>
> Whether you'd bet big bucks or not, that statement is unwarranted.  More
> dmb blarney.
>
>
> > There is no thinking or reading or interpreting involved in reaching
> your position.
>
> You seem to take whatever flits through your mind as fact.  That's a form
> of psychological naive realism.  And your words represent empty rhetoric.
>
>
> > It's just an attitude for which you invent a whole series of incoherent
> rationalizations. You have no actual arguments.
>
> More unwarranted statements.  Do you expect me to respond to your baloney.
>  -  Why not let go of Marsha?   You claim that you want the MD to promote
> philosophical discussion, but they seem to be beyond your ability to
> initiate.
>
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to