Greetings Paco, I think your answer is very noble and I agree. No matter how small or grand the gesture, it should be carried out with awareness and a caring, open heart, a very noble aim. Or at the very least, as Ian suggests, with respect.
Marsha On Sep 4, 2013, at 3:18 AM, Francisco Albano <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: MarshaV <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 2:54 PM > Subject: Re: [MD] the disease, the cure, the volume of material > > > > dmb, > > A MoQ is the sum of all the readings of the texts; there is no one, correct > reading. There is no priest required to explain THE MoQ. . . . > > Marsha > > Paco: > > Amen. But how to judge whether an interpretation is of high, higher or > highest quality? My answer: social praxis. For example, if an interpretation > enables one to fight for justice, peace and care for the earth, or to serve > the people well, especially the poor, deprived, oppressed and marginalized, > the interpretation is of high (at least) quality sustained, if temporarily, > by Dynamic Quality. IMHO. > > > "El Senor te bendiga y te guarde; > el Senor te mire con agrado y te extienda su amor; > el Senor te muestre su favor y te conceda la paz." > (Numeros 6:24-26) > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
