Marsha, >> This has resulted in arguments and disagreements and name calling and all >> the rest of it because if we presume that we're all here for the same thing >> and we actually are here for very different reasons, with very different >> values and intentions, then disharmony results. And this is what has >> happened; especially with regard to dmb and yourself. > > I think you might pursue a discussion with dmb, or Ron, or Andre. > > >> Anyway, it seems to me that Nagarjuna is all about the insight that all >> things arise from DQ. > > Nagarjuna argues that the entire everyday world is, from the ultimate > standpoint, nonexistent. > > >> Other things exist on this planet that are not Dynamic Quality right? > > Yes, static patterns of value conventionally exist. > > >> Is the insight that DQ is the source of all things the only valuable insight >> of the MOQ? > > *Only* valuable insight? No, I don't think so.
Shall I expect a response to the rest of what I wrote or are you not interested in this discussion where we are talking ideas? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
