Is "seems to" more than opinion?  


> On Dec 5, 2013, at 8:24 AM, Ron Kulp <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The topic of value rigidity 
> Seems to rest on the concept
> Of "facts". Not opinion or hypothesis.
> Reflection and reasoning from facts.
> Ego keeps us from being empirical .
> Causes us to make assumptions like
> Facts are just opinions.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:37 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> To me, this is the type of suffering the Buddha addressed.  
>> 
>> 
>> "I keep wanting to go back to that analogy of fishing for facts. I can just 
>> see somebody asking with great frustration, ``Yes, but which facts do you 
>> fish for? There's got to be more to it than that.'' 
>> 
>> "But the answer is that if you know which facts you're fishing for you're no 
>> longer fishing. You've caught them. I'm trying to think of a specific 
>> example. -- All kinds of examples from cycle maintenance could be given, but 
>> the most striking example of value rigidity I can think of is the old South 
>> Indian Monkey Trap, which depends on value rigidity for its effectiveness. 
>> The trap consists of a hollowed-out coconut chained to a stake. The coconut 
>> has some rice inside which can be grabbed through a small hole. The hole is 
>> big enough so that the monkey's hand can go in, but too small for his fist 
>> with rice in it to come out. The monkey reaches in and is suddenly 
>> trapped...by nothing more than his own value rigidity. He can't revalue the 
>> rice. He cannot see that freedom without rice is more valuable than capture 
>> with it. The villagers are coming to get him and take him away. They're 
>> coming closer -- closer! -- now! What general advice...not specific 
>> advice...but what general 
 a
> dv
>> ice would you give the poor monkey in circumstances like this? 
>> 
>> "Well, I think you might say exactly what I've been saying about value 
>> rigidity, with perhaps a little extra urgency. There is a fact this monkey 
>> should know: if he opens his hand he's free. But how is he going to discover 
>> this fact? By removing the value rigidity that rates rice above freedom. How 
>> is he going to do that? Well, he should somehow try to slow down 
>> deliberately and go over ground that he has been over before and see if 
>> things he thought were important really were important and, well, stop 
>> yanking and just stare at the coconut for a while. Before long he should get 
>> a nibble from a little fact wondering if he is interested in it. He should 
>> try to understand this fact not so much in terms of his big problem as for 
>> its own sake. That problem may not be as big as he thinks it is. That fact 
>> may not be as small as he thinks it is either. That's about all the general 
>> information you can give him.
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> "On the road now and talking about traps again. The next one is important. 
>> It's the internal gumption trap of ego. 
>> 
>> "Ego isn't entirely separate from value rigidity but one of the many causes 
>> of it. If you have a high evaluation of yourself then your ability to 
>> recognize new facts is weakened. Your ego isolates you from the Quality 
>> reality. When the facts show that you've just goofed, you're not as likely 
>> to admit it. When false information makes you look good, you're likely to 
>> believe it. On any mechanical repair job ego comes in for rough treatment. 
>> You're always being fooled, you're always making mistakes, and a mechanic 
>> who has a big ego to defend is at a terrific disadvantage. If you know 
>> enough mechanics to think of them as a group, and your observations coincide 
>> with mine, I think you'll agree that mechanics tend to be rather modest and 
>> quiet. There are exceptions, but generally if they're not quiet and modest 
>> at first, the work seems to make them that way. And skeptical. Attentive, 
>> but skeptical, But not egoistic. There's no way to bullshit your way into 
>> looking good on a mechan
 i
> ca
>> l repair job, except with someone who doesn't know what you're doing. 
>> 
>> "-- I was going to say that the machine doesn't respond to your personality, 
>> but it does respond to your personality. It's just that the personality that 
>> it responds to is your real personality, the one that genuinely feels and 
>> reasons and acts, rather than any false, blown-up personality images your 
>> ego may conjure up. These false images are deflated so rapidly and 
>> completely you're bound to be very discouraged very soon if you've derived 
>> your gumption from ego rather than Quality. 
>> 
>> "If modesty doesn't come easily or naturally to you, one way out of this 
>> trap is to fake the attitude of modesty anyway. If you just deliberately 
>> assume you're not much good, then your gumption gets a boost when the facts 
>> prove this assumption is correct. This way you can keep going until the time 
>> comes when the facts prove this assumption is incorrect."
>> 
>>     - ZAMM 
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to