Andre, Andre:
> So what are you saying John? Is that the way to go? Will this save the > world?...should you consider it worth saving? > > J: sort of, Andre. But more so. I'm saying "is this just fighting the enemy on his home ground?" or "Is this the best (highest quality) way to look at things?" A: What does the MoQ say to all this? J: That's a good question. I'll ask you another instead - what *does* the MoQ say? A: > Do you agree with the pursuit of SOM instead of MoQ? J: NO. I hate SOM. I hate objectivism and I hate materialism. Even if SOM equals power, I'd rather be powerless and die with my middle finger thrust up in the air and follow the quality way. ok? A: > Would you rather follow 'cold-hearted, objective and calculating' an ever > revolving search for truth or would you rather do what is good (MoQ)? > > J: already answered. A: > And if you want to know what is good just read ZMM amd LILA. > > J: I admit both of those confirmed the good I already knew, but as the source of Good? That's a bit presumptious. Pirsig was just a man, as I am too. A: > What do you want? > > Good Community. J Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
