Ian,



On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Ian Glendinning
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Yes John,
>
> Necessarily so give the evolved nature of Western dominated
> socio-cultural-intellectual society.
>
> So not necessarily so for all times and case-studies beyond human
> individuals - one reason why we need human patterns bigger than
> humans.
>
>
J:  I can certainly applaud the value of diversity, but having one best,
isn't that actually a monoculture?  If one above all the others so
completely dominates as to be the top-dawg, reigning champ, then what's to
do except fall on your knees and bow?


> I think it was Dave Thomas (no another old Lila-squadder?) invented
> their own language to avoid the SOMist traps - but of course that
> limits the people you can converse with.



J:  DT's conversation alone is satisfying enough.  He was a good thinker
and discussion-ist.
imho opinion his problem was dealing with one of the MoQ discussion's
biggest problem ever - over-vilifying the value of subject and object.
It's a blind reaction - equating the overthrow of S/O thinking with it's
negation.  Just because S and O are subordinate does not mean they are
non-existent and yet people attack them as if they were worthless
concepts.   Where is that gonna get you?  A private language is a
contradiction in terms.

Ian:


> Another hero of mine Alan
> Rayner, uses the language of "natural inclusionality" which makes for
> very difficult (objective) communication - but these are people who
> understand the problem and the nature of the improvement possible if
> we can break SOMism. However their projects are necessarily
> millennial. not just lifetimes, so there need to be "kulturbarer"
> beyond the individuals - hey how about a faith-based religion - now
> there's a novel idea ;-)
>
>
Or better yet, a new, good novel.  Now THAT would be religious.

Take Care,

John
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to