Hi David, Your Niels Bohr seems wrong at first glance. He didn't state objects do not exist before the experiment. His thesis was that nothing at all could be said of them... there was no way of verifying if they existed or not.
As for Kant, I'm not sure it's entirely proper to label him an idealist. Like Bohr, he seemed to be saying our means of accessing the phenomenal world are limited. But then again his work is so complex even scholars don't agree upon what he was saying. Finally, rather than 'our current metaphysics' it might be better to say 'the prevailing metaphysics of western culture,' or words to that effect. Thank you, Dan http://www.danglover.com On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:17 AM, David Harding <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I’ve just launched a SOM primer website which briefly explains Subject-Object > Metaphysics and the problems created by it. > > It can be found at www.som.is <http://www.som.is/> > > I hope to launch an MOQ one soon as well. > > Feedback - positive or negative welcome.. > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html -- Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
