Greetings,

I'm currently reading Bruce Wilshire's *Primal Roots of American Philosophy
<http://www.amazon.com/Primal-Roots-American-Philosophy-Phenomenology/dp/0271020261/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1423683794&sr=1-1&keywords=the+primal+roots+of+american+philosophy>-
*and finding it amazing.  Where has this been all my life?

"Continuing his quest to bring American philosophy back to its roots, Bruce
Wilshire connects the work of such thinkers as Thoreau, Emerson, Dewey, and
James with Native American beliefs and practices. His search is not for
exact parallels, but rather for fundamental affinities between the equally
"organismic" thought systems of indigenous peoples and classic American
philosophers."

If that doesn't harmonize with Pirsig's MoQ, then I'm a rabbit.

  "Maybe when Phædrus got this metaphysics all put together people would
see that the value-centered reality it described wasn't just a wild thesis
off into some new direction but was a connecting link to a part of
themselves which had always been suppressed by cultural norms and which
needed opening up. He hoped so.
The experience of William James Sidis had shown that you can't just tell
people about Indians and expect them to listen.

They already know about Indians. Their cup of tea is full. The cultural
immune system will keep
them from hearing anything else. Phædrus hoped this Quality metaphysics was
something that would get past the immune system and show that American
Indian mysticism is not something alien from American culture. It's a deep
submerged hidden root of it."
  Robert M. Pirsig, Lila


"Whereas in Aristotle's vision quantity and quality are essential aspects
of the ground of being, in the scientist-philosophers from the seventeenth
century on they fly apart. When universities were professionalized in the
last decades of the last century, they were partitioned and constituted
along the lines of dualisms or polar oppositions.' These are eccentric
bifurcations in which one side or the other is given precedence as a result
of whatever wind of doctrine or individual whim is blowing at the moment:
subjective/ objective-which matches qualitative/quantitative-and
self/other, individual/group, mind/matter, rational/irrational,
present/past, male/female, and so on. Professors live embedded in these
mental-institutional structures. No fiddling with managerial arrangements
in the university moves them out of this trance."


Bruce Wilshire, Primal Roots of American Philosophy
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to