On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:12 PM, A Serna <sab...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for accepting me into the discussion.I have only recently discovered 
> Pirsig's books and read both with great pleasure I must say. It made me 
> wonder about why he didn't continue publishing.  I did some search for his 
> bio and I think I understand why, but nevertheless it leaves you wanting more 
> of it, like a selfish want for more of his thoughts, more of his mind.  Like 
> I said, selfish...From the numerous ideas that stroke me as brilliant and 
> clarifying I wish to discuss the one about the Four levels or historical 
> evolutionary steps.The analogy with computer hardware vs software is quite 
> useful when trying to describe the never-ending question about the 
> relationship of mind-world in the subject-object perspective of things.  Also 
> his allusion to Carbon and how it is a kind of bridge that is in the 
> biological (aka carbon based organisms) and the inorganic was a strike of 
> brilliance.  But the point I am trying to discuss is that of time, more 
> specifically rate of change.
  F
>  or significant 'evolutionary' changes to occur we need an inclusion into the 
> Dynamic Quality, it is the vehicle of that change.  At the inorganic level 
> this change and the Dynamic Quality processes that it needs, take billions of 
> years.  Billions of years and unimaginable amounts of energy I have to add.  
> Comparatively to this, the Biological level takes millions, not billions of 
> years for Dynamic quality to produce significant evolution.  Like when 
> single-cell organisms gathered into more complex ones, and when some of them 
> decided to grow teeth and have start biting each other.  The next level up, 
> at the Societal level we need perhaps thousands of years, maybe even hundreds 
> to get evolutionary changes.This brings me to the top level, and the main 
> item of my discussion, at the Intellectual level the rate, of change. I am 
> daring to suggest, is infinite, and it requires far less energy than the 
> first, or any of the other levels.  The Intellect changes constantly, 
> immediatel
 y,
>   only to propose another change right after.  The Static patterns of Quality 
> and the Dynamic patterns have turned the other way.  Let me elaborate.  At 
> the inorganic level the weight (for lack of a better word) of the Static 
> patterns of Quality is almost insurmountable, that is why it takes billions 
> of years for Dynamic patterns to emerge, survive and have an impact.  Then as 
> we go through Biological, Society, Intellect; this weighting changes.  At the 
> Biological level we still have a very heavy Static pattern, but it is easier 
> by an enormous factor to impress evolutionary Dynamic changes than at the 
> inorganic level.  At the Society level the weighting is more balanced, and it 
> takes a little focus on either side of the scale to tip it.  I think this was 
> the turmoil that Pirsig talks about, that un-concluded war of the 20th 
> century between Society and Intellect, he proposed that the jury was still 
> out on that one.But what if we have turned that corner already?  What if (the
  W
>  estern world) is at the Intellectual rung now?  The rate of change is 
> infinite, in our 'old' and decrepit Western world language we would call it 
> by the word of 'chaos' but that is not the case, it is the triumph (maybe) of 
> the Intellect.  Take the internet of things for instance.  We can have 
> individuals delving in pure intellect existence for part of their lives.  A 
> soliloquy of interaction with intellectual entities of numbers, codes and 
> signals, not with other humans.  The utmost achievement will be when the 
> Turing test has been passed.  Artificial Intelligence independent of Society, 
> Biology and Inorganic patterns or Quality.I am not a futurist or anything 
> like that.  I just wanted to share a view of our modern times and journey 
> with the aid of Pirsig... or with the aid of my little understanding of 
> Pirsig I should say.Have a great day.A
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html



-- 
http://www.danglover.com
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to