Hi David. Long time no see.... The assertation would only make sense in an occult environment;(imho); The way i should suggest to read it,is as a derivative summary of two different lines of reasoning only. But this does not mean the Turner brief is unimportant.It is dated.Obsolete. Strange that it keeps bugging people.
Adrie 2016-08-01 17:59 GMT+02:00 david <dmbucha...@hotmail.com>: > > > > ________________________________ > Tuukka Virtaperko said: "In his letter Pirsig also mentions that the > argument that the Metaphysics of Quality is not an intellectual formulation > is not clear to him. > > dmb says: > > As I read it, Pirsig was referring to the assertion that subject-object > dualism is equal to the intellectual level and since the MOQ rejects > subject-object dualism, the MOQ is beyond the intellectual level. When > Pirsig says this assertion "is not clear to him," he is politely saying > that the assertion makes no sense. I'm fairly certain that Pirsig is right > about that. > > Thanks. > > > -- > parser > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > -- parser Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
