Any metaphysics that explicitly disallows the undefinable concept of
Quality or Dynamic Quality is contrary to the Metaphysics of Quality. It
is a cause of irreconcilability. However I do see the empathical cause
for the point you are making.
Tuk
On 31-Dec-16 15:43, Adrie Kintziger wrote:
I think its good to read these materials.But things on wiki's are not
always what they seem.Some are very deceptive.
In fact, what this author is presenting here is actually nothing more than a
collection of derivatives from Wittgensteins work on logic.It is spiced and
salted with some previously known paradoxes in a new disguise.
The best way of putting it ,in my opinion,is to regard it as a new attempt
to launch the Tractatus-logico etc,....explained with the terminology of a
computerprogrammer, or a very strong logical thinker.And a very intelligent
thinker,...clearly,this however does not prove him right in any way or
field.
I don't think it will generate clarifications on reality itself,or add new
insights;
it is kinda developed to work as an upide down gearbox,not shifting up, but
in fact , shifting down further, in a halted car.
I wished you would not take this as critisism, because it is'nt.You should
explore these things, they are less boring than Wittgenstein,and he was not
all that clever also.
the only part of critics i have is about your statement, "competitor to the
moq and amoq", There is no competion,connection,or game to win.
2016-12-31 8:52 GMT+01:00 Tuukka Virtaperko <[email protected]>:
Chris Langan, developer of the CTMU, which is a competitor to the MOQ and
AMOQ, does not understand the MOQ.
Citing http://ctmucommunity.org/wiki/Cognitive-Theoretic_Model_of_t
he_Universe
***
On the other hand, mind acts as a filter: that which does not conform to
mental categories is irrelevant to perception, and therefore not real.
Langan here breaks with Kant, who posited a noumenal reality of
"things-in-themselves", independent of the phenomenal reality we perceive.
Discarding this "Kantian fallacy", Langan rejects noumena as oxymoronic
"inconceivable concepts"[21] and holds that phenomenal reality, as the only
reality we can know, is the only reality there is.
***
This means Langan's understanding of philosophy is at the level of ZAMM.
It is not at the level of LILA. The phenomenal reality is romantic quality.
Langan is oblivious to Dynamic Quality.
Tuk
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
