dear david:
you suggested:
<I'm sure some of Lithien's questions about "observation" at <the first
three levels would be answered in reading this <paper.
im way ahead of you...*S i printed all 16 pages of the paper last friday
but havent read it yet, although i will this week. even though, it seemed
to be cursorily dismissed by some, i've always been attracted to a theory
which would be supported by scientific thought. it's as if a correlation
between both metaphysics and science is inevitable once we start getting
closer to the truth. that is why i am intrigued by Bohr's complementarity
theory which glove presented so well.
i will let you know what my thoughts are after reading the paper and thank
you for bringing it to our attention.
lithien
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
