ROGER IS STILL TRYING TO SHARPEN HIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOQ
On 3/29 Glove wrote the following about our 99% development of the terms of
the MOQ:
>>>>>While the differences in opinion are seemingly small, the complexities
underlying those differences are enormous. But that's what makes things
interesting! Who wants to agree on everything anyway?>>>>
Okay, I accept your point that subtleties are crucial.
After the exchange we had off line,Glove, I am again revising my exact
wording on Pirsig's philosophy. What do you think of my latest attempt? I
see this as 100% accurate with the material from our off-line exchange....Do
you agree, or am I still missing something? My take on it:
1). DQ is immediate, undivided experience.
2) Undivided experience is an event. It is the quality event creating
subjects and objects.
3) Static quality and patterns are analoguous experiences. Mind and matter
are derived from immediate experience. (sq is derived from DQ)
4) Quality includes sq and DQ. Immediate experience and patterns derived
from immediate experience.
Roger
MOQ Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
