Hello,
Some comments on some comments:
Platt writes about Pirsig's observation that twentieth-century
intellectual faith in man's basic goodness as spontaneous and natural is
disastrously na�ve. He says, "Thus, to rely on people's 'sense of fairness' to
promote individual
freedom while maintaining social order appears to me to be Utopian. What do you think?
Do you a believe in the perfectibility of mankind?"
My experience is that when I rely on other people's sense of fairness, I get burned.
But I rely on my own. I think mankind will slowly get close to perfection.
Ruthlessness is part of the means, as Glove well knows when he asks: "�..there is more
than a hint of ruthlessness in your personal confrontation with the particular young
man (my apprentice) you speak of, wouldn't you agree?"
Ruthlessness, empathy and compassion combined. Ruthlessness alone is just a
cold-blooded calculation such as what the Nazi's used. Richard Budd heard this and
said: 'You've gotta be kidding right??? 'Cold-blooded Intellectualism'??? No way.
Unless of course you feel that executing any non-aryans is somehow an intellectually
based plan."
Well, I feel like the Nazi leaders used scapegoatism to whip up their even more
ignorant countrymen. They made a ghoulish mess with low-quality intellectual,
heartless, half-baked logic and then coldly brought forth their final solution. A
more biological level murderer would be a cannibal. The Nazis saw themselves as
thinking people rather then mere cannibals. Today, people get marginalized by the
corporate machines in a softer version of what the Nazi's did. My point is that the
word "ruthlessness" has such a bad connotation to it because it represents intellect
divorced from the heart.
And Fred sticks up for the much-maligned hippies. He writes: " If not for the hippie
movement, The
Vietnam war would have lasted many more years and thousands of more lives
would have been lost to this futile and corrupt war."
Yes, Peace, Love and Understanding. And carrying a big stick. And not being na�ve.
And not lapsing into cold-blooded, low quality intellectual choices. All of the
above, in rt sync, and laws that reflect that. Until mankind in general has developed
a high proclivity for doing the right thing. And doesn't require blind adherence to
the old written dharma. And can ride his bike without the training wheels.
Bill
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
