Greetings,
Definitely interesting Roger.
>PS -- If physicists were ever to prove that all is Energy, should they also
>just throw out that term too?
Point well made and taken. However this seems a lot more precise than saying that all
is good. Good
for what? Good for survival? Good for evolving further? Good in itself? Itself in
good? Why? What is
the function of the term 'good' here? The function of the term 'energy' is a lot
easier to pin down.
Mary, I love jokes at my expense so don't worry. There are few things worse than being
taken
seriously.
You will, I'm sure, appreciate that I care little for the internal politics of
America, but how
about ACTUALLY signing up your kids for military service? You could kill two birds
with one stone.
Not only would child minding costs be eliminated for mothers (and fathers), but you
would also give
the children a hell of a good start for when they get older and are sent around the
world to bomb
the shit out of everyone else. The conservative right would love it. :-)
John Wooden Leg got me thinking with his inability to differentiate varieties of dogs.
This seems to
have become ingrained into the American psyche, now manifesting itself as an inability
to
differentiate between different vehicle types - like tanks and tractors for example.
:-)
Struan
------------------------------------------
Struan Hellier
< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Gestalt is at its most effective with overly socialised, restrained, constricted
individuals." -
!!!
(Irma Lee Shepard, leading Gestalt exponent) - It wasn't me guv!
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]