Hi Avid, Roger, Ian and group:

Since Avid has brought up the subject of Art and the MOQ I'd like to 
throw in my 2 cents.

Avid�s Fusion Theory of Art may be helpful to some. But, for me it's 
far too complicated and, if I may say so, too scholarly.

Art is, first of all, an experience. The intellectual patterns come 
afterwards and are mostly irrelevant to the aesthetic experience. 

Here�s my favorite Theory of Art:

�Imagine that you walk down a street past, say, a car where 
someone has the radio on and it plays a tune you've never heard 
before but which is so fantastically good it just stops you in your 
tracks.� (Lila, Chap. 9)

IMHO, whatever is so fantastically good that it stops me in my tracks 
is art. It doesn't make any difference what it is, who made it, what 
period it comes from or what art critics, historians or theorists say 
about it.

Aesthetic impact�that�s the reason for art if a reason must be 
found. Great art gives you a sudden, immense pleasure of 
aliveness. Your static patterns are weakened momentarily. You're 
suddenly pulled out of subject-object duality into unity with the 
timeless. �Dynamic Quality all around you shines through." 

Walter Pater put it this way:

�For art comes to you proposing frankly
To give you nothing but the highest quality
To your moments as they pass,
And simply for those moments' sake."

To tie art directly to the MOQ, here's what Ian P. Hornsby wrote at 
the end of his wonderful thesis "On Quality" that was recently added 
to the Forum:

"In turn, ethics is a component of aesthetics because ethical 
guidance is directed towards values and values are conceived and 
perceived aesthetically.

"Quality is a form of harmony and this is why things such as 
language, DNA, and the physical forces which bond particles 
together, survive. It is because they have beauty. Beauty, poetry, 
quality, maybe this is the reason that there is something in this 
universe rather than nothing.�

As Ian suggests, I think art (quality, beauty) lies at the center of 
existence. To say much more about it is to detract from directly 
experiencing that essence through artistic works. I agree with 
whoever said, �The only valid thing in art is the one thing that cannot 
be explained.�

Platt




MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to