ROGER AGREES WITH GREG THAT JOHN HAS
SOME INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS
GREG:
A "flash of insight" to me is hardly a static
experience at the moment it occurs. Therefore I don't agree with
Beasley's assertion that "the dynamic...is at the biological level" with
intellectual/artistic levels being relegated to some undefined "broader"
type of quality. Dynamic quality, in my opinion and experience, can
occur at any level .
ROGER:
I agree completely with you and most Of David and Platt's critiques of John's
essay. John's analysis is well thought out and of excellent overall quality,
but it reveals several fundamental misunderstandings of the MOQ. A couple of
weeks ago I had suggested that we take it apart assumption by assumption, but
never got any response other than John suggesting something similar on the
LS.
Roger
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
