Just a small point: >* Language is not used only by humans [for the millionth time]. >and maybe another: >* The form is no less important then content since old Greece to today. The >question was [is], what is the best way to convey a world picture. Aristo >tried to change from a narrative mode [mythology], to a buildingblock mode >[definitions]. This way things interrelate better then in mythology. >SPQ [static patterns of quality] are an option substitute definitions who >failed because of their over static nature [lack of dynamism]. SPQ is a >building block too. >Last point: >* Language was looked at as barrier from the very beginning [as insuring >that >intellectual stuff remain inside a social layer], see the myth of the tower >of Babylon as an example. >Definitions are not language dependent, SPQ are not language dependant [they >can be conveyed in every language]. They are forms. >But language has in its form, a "metaphysical luggage" that gets in the way. >That's why I offered in the "next freedom" freedom of language which in >theories as agent could relate to other theories and exchange data without >the metaphysical burden of language. >In science they tried to introduce "terms" as metaphysically free lingual >entities, but it failed, because they could not create a world of terms >without the narrative of how they relate to one another [theories]. And >theories are "language ridden". >Avid and don't forget to be gentle Avid icq 6598359 MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
