David T,
I have heard numerous other metanarratives including Ken Wilbur's , Dawkin
and Blackmore's 'genes and memes', and Kitaro Nishida's 'nature,
consciousness and cultural/intellectual.'
The magic of the MOQ is that it values not one truth, but quality. As I read
more of Popper and modern science, the more apparent it is that the power of
the scientific method is the same way. It values the process of refutation
and explanation every bit as much as logical consistency and observation.
The process is more important than the dogma.
The MOQ too values not our explanations of reality, for it flatly denies that
reality is knowable or defineable. Yet it relentlously encourages us to try
to define reality in the highest quality possible.
Roger
MOQ Online Homepage - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Unsubscribe - http://www.moq.org/md/index.html
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
