Why does the notion of freewill have to be 'absolute', in the sense of 'either there is, or there isn't'? - aren't these kinds of dualities exactly what Pirsig (and everyone's aunt) was trying to address? ppl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diana McPartlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 06 February 2000 05:14 Subject: Re: RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM > Richard & MD > > Richard wrote: MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- Re : MD Free will & SOM John C. Pryor
- MD That's cleared that one up th... Struan Hellier
- Re: MD That's cleared that o... Richard Chamberlain
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM Struan Hellier
- Re: Re : MD Free will & ... Richard Chamberlain
- RE: Re : MD Free will & ... rv
- RE: Re : MD Free will & ... Struan Hellier
- RE: Re : MD Free will & ... rv
- RE: Re : MD Free will & ... John C. Pryor
- Re : MD Free will & SOM David L Thomas
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM Peter Lennox
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM David Buchanan
- Re: Re : MD Free will & SOM WrldEys90
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM David Lind
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM David Lind
- RE: Re : MD Free will & SOM rv
- MD Computer Choice Horse
- Re: MD Computer Choice Stephen Hoffmann
