To: Rick (and Jonathan)
From: Roger
Re: The relationship of DQ to Chaos 

RICK:

As I have always understood it, the "chaos" that sits below the inorganic 
level is a sort of pure or "unpatterned DQ"--- the sea of DQ in which the 
island of SQ resides and arises from.  But I have recently been wondering if 
this doesn't create a problem.

ROGER:

Although I can see value in your truth, it creates several problems from my 
perspective. First, it again implies an objectivisation of reality, which the 
MOQ flatly rejects.  

Second, your model seems slightly more substantive than experiential.  The 
MOQ refers to DQ  as a stream of quality events.  To assign some type of 
level to DQ seems to drift away from this analogy.

Third, I don't buy the chaos = DQ analogy.  Pirsig admits flirting with this 
concept, but I believe he too rejects it.  The thread Jonathan and I are 
engaged in takes this issue on directly.  Randomness and pattern are not 
intrinsic characteristics in reality, they are both interpretations of 
experience, or in the prior terminology, interpretations of quality events.  


RICK:
 
For if that chaotic "level" is equal to DQ itself then there is a clash in 
the moral codes.  For one code establishes "the supremacy of DQ over SQ" and 
another establishes "the supremacy of the inorganic over the chaotic". But if 
the inorganic level is pure DQ then this second code might as well "establish 
the  supremacy of the inorganic over DQ"--- I'm sure I don't have to list the 
many problems that this creates for the system, and I know there must be a 
problem in my understanding of the "chaotic".  So I guess I'm asking two 
questions:
(1) If DQ always morally "beats" SQ, and if the chaotic is pure DQ, then how 
can the Inorganic ever morally triumph over the Chaotic? 
(2)If the chaotic "level" doesn't equal pure, unpatterned DQ--- then what's 
the difference???


ROGER:

DQ is pure experience, it is the stream of quality events prior to 
categorization into levels, patterns or non patterns (randomness or chaos). 
This interpretation of the MOQ is consistent with modern science (though 
science usually explains it more objectively.) Quantum mechanics is science's 
most successful theory of the underlying nature of reality.  Quantum reality 
is in essence event based. 'Objective' reality is explained as patterned and 
unpatterned inter-relationships, with terms like 'particle' and 'wave' 
attached to the emerging patterns.  Higher level inorganic or biological 
patterns are explained via complexity.  Again though, matter and life are 
extremely complex patterns of events.

In summary, I would suggest a model where DQ is not the 'chaotic level', but 
where DQ is the underlying pre-patterned/unpatterned stream of quality 
events/experiences/interrelationships.  Sq and the four levels are high 
quality, logically consistent interpretations of DQ. 

Does this model work for you?

Roger 

   

 Rick >>


MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to