Platt Holden wrote:
> Hi Group:
>
> A review of recent posts reveals that most of us currently participating in
the
> discussion are believers in a reality �out there,� independent of us. The
nature
> of this transcendent reality varies:
>
> To Ken Clark it�s a �function� or �process.�
>
> To Jonathan Marder it�s �forces.�
>
> To David Lind it�s �too big� for us to understand.
WAIT A MINUTE - DID I SAY REALITY WAS SOMETHING "OUT THERE" -
INDEPENDENT OF US? HMMMM....DON'T REMEMBER DOING SO. THOUGHT I JUST
COMMENTED ON THE IMMENSITY OF IT - NOT WHETHER IT'S INDEPENDENT OF US.
PLEASE BE CAREFUL IN STATING MY VIEW FOR ME. YOU DIDN'T GET IT RIGHT
THIS TIME. I UNDERSTAMD WHERE YOU MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN THE IDEA I SEE IT
AS AN "IT" (OUT THERE - SEPERATE FROM ME) - BECAUSE I DESCRIBE IT AS
"IT" - BUT THIS IS JUST LINGUISTICS.
THAT'S ALL.
Shalom
David Lind
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
