Though a part of everyday usage (that book was lacking in quality),
Pirsig never seems to have considered the existence of things of poor
quality. I wonder what would have happened if Phaedrus had asked his
students to define poor quality. It seems much easier to do, though it
deals a serious blow to SOM & MOQ. Do you have any thoughts on MO(N)Q?
Jeff
"When is a man in mere understanding? When he sees one thing seperate
from another.
When is a man above mere understanding? When a man sees all in all, thern
a man stands
beyond mere understanding."-Eckhardt
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
