Hi JoVo,
Your statements are interesting as well as challanging, MOQers think this
way all the time. You are wondering around what RMP calls "The high country
of the mind"-. (chapter 12, LILA). Thank goodness we can always rest from
those journeys and 'come down' from that 'High Country' and rest from all
that puffing and huffing. But, going back to the high country lines of
thoughts and while around that region I do believe that you are talking
about the relationship of static patterns and dynamic patterns. What we are
looking at here is an evolution of patterns in the typical way that the
Metafisics of Quality explains. Intelectual patterns to begin with 'are
independent' of 'social patterns' but everythings keeps evolving and
changing towards Dynamic Quality and what is trobleling you right now is
that you are 'watching the evolution of an intelectual pattern into a social
pattern.
Following along the lines of the Methaphycics of Quality, we could and in
fact I have seen some statements somewhere around these communications, that
THE ENTIRE INTELLECTUAL level WILL EVOLVE into something else. What that
'something else' means or is / surely beats the rockets out of me. The
puzziling and at the same time amazing thing about all of these is that the
Methaphisics of Quality helps explain all of it.
The beauty of all of these is that we have a lot more choices. We can choose
to stay at lower levels which are more 'secured' and at times more Fun than
the higher levels.
Go back to chapter twelve of Lila, read the part about the mind/body
patterns and their relationship and lets try to 'see' again.
I think that if we look back and see the history of other civilizations, we
could see and identify that ' Evolution of Patterns '. Those Cultures which
set of values were 'unable' to evolve beyond their Intelectual level into
'that something else', simply were washed away in the sands and sediments
which now lay on layers of rocks or wander around the rivers and seas.
I have to go and ramble a bit more.
Ciao,
Carmen.
>intellectual level is NOT independent on the social level. Therefore I
>conclude,
>that a level that is (in no way) independent on a lower level, cannot be
>superior to it.
>
>Still quite confusing;anybody having ideas about DQ and emotions?
>
>This is roughly, what's giving me somehow a feeling of Non-satisfaction on
>the
>relation between intellectual-and social level, I hope it's not too
>confusing.
>Otherwise I'll hope to be ready for clarification, if necessary.
>
>Regards,
>
>JoVo
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
