Greetings,
JON:
>Is that the point I am missing? That you think there is no important
>relationship between these two distinct types of goodness? And if so, are you
>saying that this is the main defect in Pirsig's philosophy?
There is, of course, an important relationship there, but, they are not of the same
order. They
should not be seen as ontologically synonymous. The main defect? No. The main defect
is that the MoQ
relies upon SOM for its veracity.
Struan
------------------------------------------
Struan Hellier
< mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"All our best activities involve desires which are disciplined and
purified in the process."
(Iris Murdoch)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
