> I must admit, I'm slightly confused; (it's late and I'm tired); are we taking the fact that the boy couldn't walk until he witnessed examples of walking as proof that walking isn't innate? - but has anyone made such a supposition? (that walking is 'innate' as against 'acquired'). I'm not sure that walking is considered to be qualitatively different to other, more recent skills such as reading, or even driving, (or, for that matter, talking), etc.....? Am I missing something? - I look forard to debate. regards, ppl MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ introduction- post Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ introduction... Ian J Greely
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ introduc... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ introduction... Peter Lennox
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ introduc... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ intr... Peter Lennox
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social skill/ ... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Re: Walking is a social sk... Peter Lennox
- MD Genes, Memes, Darwin and Lemarck Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darwin and L... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darwin a... Jonathan B. Marder
- Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darw... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darw... Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD Genes, Memes, Darw... 3rdWavedave
