Peter and all,
> However, we being a communicative species, do actually take in others'
> perspectives as part of our own, and a useful dialogue between Q and Meme
> might throw up interesting descendants.
<< Thanks Peter, my point exactly !
And therefor I ask it here once again, read the article A Solipsistic View
on Memetics from out a MOQ perspective and tell me what is wrong with it.
Is the article a complete flaw and therefor has totally no reference to the
MOQ, well so be it. But tell me !!
Maybe there is somebody out there who is able to ' re- write ' the stuff
with more appropiate MOQ terms !?
Like what B Skutvik had throw up about Dynamic Memes is for me inte-
resting enough to take the idea in account for further thought.
And like I said before, lets work together...discuss the matter !!
Regards,
Kenneth
( I am, because we are) all Quality
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
