Hey Leland,
You Wrote:
" It seems to me that the biggest problem in "proving" that Quality =
Reality
> is one of perspective. In order to see what Reality really is, one has to
> step away and look at Reality in toto.
> This, however, is exceedingly difficult to do.
> We can only infer what Reality really is, and whether Quality bears a
close
> enough resemblance to be a possible explanation."
Your point is well taken and absolutely correct of course... however, let's
not mistake a call for EVIDENCE that Quality=Reality with a call for PROOF
that Quality=Reality. There is huge difference. As you say, "We can only
infer what Reality really is...." and we cannot make such an inference
without evidence.
Thanks for your 2 cents,
Rick
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
