Chris: Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but it seems you're saying logical analysis will always exhibit incompleteness and uncertainty due to the way our nervious systems work. If so, then your analysis of analysis (a meta-analysis) would, I assume, be equally incomplete and uncertain. Result: we must possess some form of understanding other than rational explanation. Perhaps, as Pirsig suggests, we should treat truths like paintings in an art gallery--find those you value and ignore the rest. Do you lean towards the same conclusion? Platt MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
- MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and MetaMemeMapping. dkm
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and MetaMemeMap... PzEph
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and MetaMem... dkm
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and Met... PzEph
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and... dkm
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompletenes... PzEph
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incomplet... Chris Lofting
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Platt Holden
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Platt Holden
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Chris Lofting
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Platt Holden
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Chris Lofting
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Johannes Volmert
- RE: MD Inconsistency, Incom... Chris Lofting
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness Platt Holden
- Re: MD Inconsistency, Incompleteness and MetaMemeMap... PzEph
