Hi All, Since I've been following the US-election from the very beginning with great interests, I have always tried to apply MoQ-aspects to it. To follow Pirsigs predictive level-evolution, there would have to be expected a sort of battle between the social and the intellectual level even when considered at a large scale like the rivaling for presidency between the Conservative Bush and the Democrat Gore. I'm not sure, whether Bush is really representing THE static and social and Gore really representing the intellectual and dynamic(?) or if they both have to be considered to be static, only differing by social on the one hand an intellectual on the other hand. Actually I have no real preference to one or the other, but if I had to choose I'd prefer Gore; at least he seems to be the more intelligent. But tell me, people from America, is Gore really representing the intellectual level and if he does, would this have been the intellectual level we are 'waiting' for? It is a bizarre situation, isn't it? Maybe they become both president of USA and playing dice with each other for who is going to be president and who has to take the vice-presidency. :-) Thanks for reading, best, JoVo MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/ MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at: http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
