Well I agree, if that's any help.
Pzeph.
>> TO DAN, MARCO, DANILLA, BO AND RICHARD ON LEVELS PERCEIVING AND
>> AFFECTING EACH OTHER:
>> I suggest we come to a consensus that anthropomorphizing the levels
>> is a convenient, but often-times sloppy rhetorical practice. In
>> other words, that the levels don't have "motives" or "wants" or
>> "perceptions". The levels refer to patterns of value. Each level
>> emerges out of the lower values, but the process is so complex that
>> there is little or no direct interaction between non-adjacent
>> levels. As for adjoining levels, although they do interact, I agree
>> with Bo that each level "is bound to follow its basic value." Do
>> any of you substantially disagree?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
