Hi, Marco.
Thanks for the clarity. I think I now 'get it', but disagree. If that
means I'm disagreeing with Roger or Prisig here, then that's fine. I don't
think any pattern can be a simplification, because there is absolutely no
sense in which the aesthetic continuum (the stream of experience) can be
"complex". That's my point here.
Later,
Pzeph
> From: "Marco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:33:29 +0100
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: MD Intellect and Inorganic level
>
> Hi ELEPHANT,
>
> ELE wrote:
>> ... but I just don't get how Chemistry Professors can
>> be regarded as a "simplification" of physics (you say it is the physics
> you
>> are talking about).
>
> MARCO:
> Let me a quick flashback. The thread was originated by this Roger's
> sentence:
>
> (ROGER):
> Patterns are simplifications derived from the complex stream of
> experience. All life attends to and selects and simplifies experience into
> those patterns of most importance.
>
> MARCO:
> Inorganic or not (this not the point here) IMO a pattern is a
> simplification. Using those simplifications, it's possible to build complex
> structures: biologic beings, social giants, philosophies. Patterns are like
> "bricks" by which it's possible to build the Colosseum.
>
> I'm not saying that the professor is a simplification. But every single cell
> composing the professor's body is that.
>
>
> Bye
> Marco
>
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
