| To: Danilla, Marco, Platt and The Ephelant Man
From: Rog For the record, I think there is something fundamentally wrong with any ethics that supports, or remains neutral to the destruction of advanced complex patterns such as species or ecosystems. Personally, I think we can "read into" the MOQ that we should support our underlying levels and that versatility of experience should not be isolated to man. But we shouldn't have to read it in. I think Pirsig focuses WAY, WAY too much on conflict and the negative face of Quality/evolution, and no where near enough on cooperation. I think both views together (cooperative/competitive) represent reality much better than one side alone. Rog |
- Re: MD MOQ and other species Platt Holden
- Re: MD MOQ and other species Marco
- Re: MD MOQ and other species Kenneth Van Oost
- MD Church of Reason Simon K
- RE: MD Church of Reason Richard Ridge
- Re: MD Church of Reason Simon K
- RE: MD Church of Reason Richard Ridge
- Re: MD Church of Reason elephant
- Re: MD MOQ and other species Kenneth Van Oost
- Re: MD MOQ and other species PzEph
- RISKYBIZ9
