----- Original Message ----- 
From: Kevin Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrea Sosio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: Heidegger


> dear andrea:
> 
> 
> well the joan stambaugh translation
>     is to the macquarrie and robinson translation
> what the new international version
>     is to the king james bible -
> that is, its written much more in the words
>     of our modern living language,
> for one small example,
>     she translate the german 'besorgen'
>     as 'taking care' rather than 'solicitude'
>         which shows her concern
>         for both accuracy and understandibility
> 
> mmm, as far as introductions,
>     i might advocate pirsig actually :)
> from page one, you'll notice concepts pirsig nibbled at
>     digested in a more thorough manner:
>         heidegger just goes both higher and deeper
> 
> those little picture-books like
>     'introducting heidegger' or 'heidegger for beginner's'
>         never miss the mark completely,
> they're usually written by professors
>     who've studied the material at length
> and especially appeal to visual learners
>     or those who like sugar with their medicine -
> but to really understand a word-concept like
>     Da-sein (the being of human being, the questioning subject)
> one must really examine all those instances
>     where heidgger invokes it -
> 
> and there's always going to exist
>     an uncrossable gap of intrepretation
>         because as heidegger's epic argues...
> we cannot divorce being from time
>     or, there's no being beyond time
>     or, as pirsig might say,
>         a thing without value doesn't exist
>     that is, every value lives
>         in a very specific historical/spatial place
> (this is another way of saying that
>     static qualities can never capture Dynamic Quality,
> or as heidegger puts it,
>     beings can never capture being ...
>         'The being of beings 'is' itself not a being' (p6))
> in short, constantly re-cognize heidegger's historicity
>     as he writes (p39)
>         'the question of the meaning of being
>             is the most universal
>                 and the emptiest ...
>         but at the same time
>             the possibility inheres
>                 of its most acute individualization
>                     in each particular Da-sein.'
> so make his words    yours
> 
> i myself fall into a sort of heidegger rythmn -
> if you can get through that introduction (40 pages)
>     then you're set -
> 
> questions remain:
>     'what is    is?'
>         'what does it mean    to be?'
>     (see how this question must be answered
>         before 'what is quality?' can ever be)
> that's the big difference between heidegger and pirsig
>     pirsig tries to construct a metaphysics
>     heidegger contstructs an ontology which
>         then nullifies/transcends/answers metaphysics
> 
> 
> :luv,kev
> 



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Reply via email to