Re: MD Ubiquitous Quality, Universal Mind

[elephant]

I've a question.

> From: Platt Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Those who have been on this site for awhile will recall the “Are atoms aware?”
> discussions. It seemed to some of us that it was essential that the answer be
> “Yes” if the MOQ was to hang together as a viable explanation of reality. You
> can imagine my pleasure in finding a notable physicist agreeing with the “Yes”
> answer as well as a number of biologists (mentioned in previous posts) who
> support the “mind everywhere” (panexperientialism) theory.

Why is it essential to the MOQ that atoms be aware?

e



MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html