> I think that there ought to be a Routledge paperback titled, An
> Introduction to the Metaphysics of Quality, And it should be used in a
> course for college freshman. They could write essays and stuff. Then it
> would be a "Real" discipline, and not just some fringe list on the
Internet.
> Think of how much time and energy has been wasted studying outdated and
> useless things like Religion or Art History when the kids should have been
> learning something Good. Maybe some of us could get jobs teaching
Quality,
> then people would have a reason to study it. But the first step is to
> publish a textbook. The kind with big unchanging chapter headings and
> review questions in the back. And we'll need a glossary, so that
everybody
> will be speaking the same jargon, a sort of glue to hold the book
together.
>
> Well let me know what you think,
>
> Dan Colonnese
>
Is that to say that Religion and Art History are Bad?
Perhaps there should be a guide to it all, but perhaps a reader's guide to
ZAMM, not to the MOQ. As far as these things go, ZAMM is Good, MOQ is Bad.
Is ZAMM a set text anywhere?
s
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
