Marco, Andrea and others,
Andrea wrote:
>For what concerns the first half of your question, about "biological" pleasures, I'm
>not sure they are
>only biological, but that is an interesting question, especially for the "intellect
>vs society" thread. Of
>course society needs to control biological pleasures when they are socially dangerous
>or downright
>unacceptable. The standard MOQ position should be, on the other hand, that it should
>not control
>intellectual behavior (there's a thread running on this topic).
I've gone through that tread, and I see your point. Once again Marco is covering my
opinions in a much better way than I could.
However, Marco, did you ever get any reply to your question:
>Isn't market a social pattern in your MOQ? Is the market freedom itself?
I could not find any answers to this question from Platt and the others.
Gerhard
PS, Marco:
My kids to a "Reggio Emilia" based kindergarten. I didn't know it was an Italian based
philosophy. I'm also surprised and pleased to see that I do agree so much with your
opinion in relating MoQ to political values. I guess we would disagree on a few
things, but I would like to thank you for very interesting posts - it has been a
pleasure reading your posts.
The discussion could be dull if we all agreed, so thanks also to the ones I don't
agree with :-)
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
