Hello everyone
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: MD Back on topic
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:04:10 EDT
>
>In a message dated 6/15/2001 10:15:37 AM Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> > Since all static patterns of value arise and fade Dynamically, me thinks
>you
> > phrase the statement above a bit wrongly. It is not that Dynamic Quality
> > applies to any system but any system applies to Dynamic Quality. More,
>any
> > system we are aware of comes into being only if it has value, if we are
> > aware of it; otherwise it makes no sense to even discuss. Value is
> > experience. Without experience no value arises. It is not the static
> > patterns we call families, teams, organizations, societies, cultures, or
> > nations that experience value; only a living being experiences that.
> >
>JON:
>Would it be accurate to say Value=Quality?
Essential.
Dan
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
