|
Dear Matt, David, John
& others,
Matt brought up "the plight of
this discussion group" (13/6 18:29 -0500) and quite a few others
reacted.
Matt wrote 13/6 18:29
-0500
"The track and platform we need is, quite
obviously, the MoQ. Discussions should include interpretations of the
platform, extensions of the platform, and why particular parts of the platform
are a load of crap. Everything should be about the platform. As to
what should be extensions of the platform, since the MoQ is a general
description of everything, everything is an extension of the MoQ.
That makes God and politics and the death penalty all viable topics of
discussion, but only in relation to the MoQ."
David wrote 14/6 23:55
+1200
"The concept of
studying the MoQ and nothing pertaining to its implications in the environment
is rather static quality, almost absurd as Pirsig explained it can't ever be
completely understood."
I sympathise with David.
What's the use of just creating a better metaphysics (a better platform for
discussion)?
I feel (but can't yet
fully explain) that metaphysics is (one of the ways of) latching DQ on a 5th
level of static patterns of value. Metaphysics can't be fully founded by
intellect. Part of it remains "a matter of faith and belief"
(Marty's and Clarke's words 6/6 10:04 -0700 and 15:39 -0400) when it can't ever
be completely understood by the empirical and rational modes of knowing
(as John explained 15:33 +1000 rephrasing Ken Wilber). The "groping 5th
level" (Bo 7/6 20:36 +0200) seems to me to be connected to
John/Wilber's spiritual mode of knowing. Shouldn't this 5th level
"offer freedom to lower levels of evolution" (Lila ch. 12,
Bantam edition p.176) more specifically to intellectual patterns of value
(science, theology etc.)? "Freedom" means "freedom from and
breaking static patterns" (or "putting them to sleep"?!
Lila ch. 30, Bantam edition p. 440), e.g. freedom from and breaking the rules of
rational discussion. We should learn to use metaphors, paradoxes and experience
that isn't immediately translated into an opinion in this mailing list if we
want to explore this realm and want to be instrumental in latching DQ on a 5th
level.
With friendly
greetings,
Wim
Nusselder |
- MD MoQ? david wilkinson
- Wim Nusselder
