How can you be a judge of what is or is not high Quality when:
1. You praised a hoax conference paper which was complete rubbish.
2. Only had your PhD awarded by threatening legal action when is was
rejected?
In a message dated 31/01/2007 17:19:10 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Buchanan has been contributing posts on MOQ Discuss of a consistent
high quality for a number of years now. However, it is only recently that
David has turned some of his thoughts into fully developed academic papers.
I'm therefore very pleased to present one of the first of these ("Clash of
the Pragmatists") at robertpirsig.org which argues that the neo-pragmatist
Richard Rorty implicitly retains an SOM metaphysics by his overlooking of
radical empiricism.
The complete web address for David's paper is:
www.robertpirsig.org/Buchanan.htm
Best wishes,
Anthony.
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
