Marsha wrote, >>> I think that putting the MOQ in the hands of Academia would be to >>> infuse it with low value. >> >> I don't have feelings one way or the other. >> >> Your choice of words makes it sound like you see the MOQ as something that >> is or should be controlled. I find that interesting. And for the longest >> time I've >> been puzzled with the wording, "the MOQ" or "the MOQ says" as if it were >> some sentient entity or recognized work. From my point of view it is >> neither of >> these things. > > Hi Kevin, > > Controlled? Absolutely not. I just prefer the organic to the > institutionalized. > > I am probably using a poor choice of words. Which words would you suggest? Hello Marsha. Thanks for asking. I would suggest looking at the MOQ's current environment. What I found interesting were the words, "putting the MOQ." They make the MOQ look like a thing that has an environment that can be controlled, e.g., if it were given over to academia then it would be affected by the academic environment or if it is kept here it would not be affected by this or if we put it there it won't be affected by that. How is the MOQ's current environment affecting its evolution?
Kevin PS: I thought it best to change the subject line. --------------------------------- Be a PS3 game guru. Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games. moq_discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
