[Ham]
> I view it as the negation of an
> undivided primary source, negation being a constant
> principle of the source.
> Recently I've been considering this principle as
> "reciprocal". That is, if
> negation differentiates subject from object so that
> Value can be realized,
> then would not the realization of Value tend to
> reverse the affects of
> negation and annul the division? If so, then the
> cycle of existence could
> be said to come full circle by restoring the unity
> of the source.
Ham, this is exactly the 'why' some people view
your thesis differently. What I'm saying is I view
this reciprocity as two views contained within the
same reality. It is these opposing views, the one
that negates the source, and the other view that Value
realized is this together. Thus, the first view is
where you were coming from to explain yourself
(thesis, etc...). The second view is where I was
coming from. Thus, your view and my view, on the
surface, seemed to have us noticing reality from two
far away points of view. These points of view would
seem to be so far off that one might just say were
discussing two realities or better yet, two
philosophies. These two views can hinder each other
from recognizing each other so much so that these
views wouldn't notice they are pointing at the same
reality. This is why some time back I did agree with
you that Essence is really not divided and Essence is
right here, right now, not divided. You agreed with
this statement as well. I think what happened is this
Essence undivided presently is Value realized.
Essence divided is negation. Yet, as you are
beginning to point out it is this reciprocity view
that is two views, but as a reciprocity view we're
actually talking about one view or no view, maybe.
One view for Essence negated and Value realized are
the same reality. No view for Essence is undivided
and we can't view anything when Essence is undivided,
which is the same as Value realized. Yet, again, this
reciprocity view of one view/no view is still Essence
or you might call it reciprocity view. Is this
anything close to how your viewing this?
thanks.
long time no talk,
SA
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
moq_discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
